- Acting of Lead Performers
- Acting of Supporting Cast
- Music Score
- Title Sequence
- Historical Importance
- Would You Recommend?
0 Member Ratings
NO REVIEWS AVAILABLE
The title has not been reviewed. Be the first to write a review by clicking here to start.
- James Gee
Almost as cheesy as an honest Carol Burnett tv comedy skit. Harvey Korman could have done a more believable character than Rock. The movie is passable if you can accept it as comical Texas cliche' cringeworthy camp.
Good story but weak acting
I agree with many of the comments below. Elizabeth Taylor is at her very best in Giant. She is warm yet strong. It's as if she actually understood the many nuances of the plot and her role while Rock Hudson was too busy working on his tan and his hair. He has no acting range unless A to B is considered to be a range. And I understand that this was James Dean's final role before his untimely death but he is weird as Jett Rink. He took that tormented persona too far in this movie. He is so tragic that it's difficult to even understand his mumbling. And the phony aging process is so over the top for this character that it's almost cartoonish. The best scenes are when Elizabeth Taylor's character stands up for the Latinos on that ridiculous oversized ranch. There is such sincerity in those scenes as she challenges the macho, bigoted fertilizer her on-screen husband upholds. Hudson's character has one moment of redemption as a two dimensional boob in the final scenes (the fist fight in the diner and the final scene) when he finally stands up for a principle beyond his own personal gain. This movie is worth watching because of Ms Taylor, however. She is wonderful.
- Liz Fan
I love Liz and she was lovely in this movie. I don't think Rock Hudson was the best casting choice for the male lead, though. Why didn't they cast one of the many talented stars that appeared in westerns? Hudson is ok when portraying urban metrosexual types, but not believable as a rugged Texas rancher. Although handsome, he's not masculine and rugged. And Dean also seems miscast. He looked ridiculous with the bad makeup, and was very hard to understand through his mumbling. It's an interesting movie and a great vehicle for lovely Liz, but would have been better with different casting. The sister was well-cast, though.
- Jackie VanRooyen
What??? I love this movie! Can't wait to see again! Love Rock Hudson as Bick and Elizabeth as his wife!
Hudson is just awful
When Rock Hudson is playing a pill popping hypochondriacal character who believes he is doomed in Send Me No Flowers he is perfectly cast with Doris Day. His breathy voice, his over-the-top fatal expressions and his rote mannerisms all work. He is funny. In Giant, he is an actor playing a character way out of his league. Every thing is a stretch for him, He is acting but never actually plays the part of Bic Benedict. He's physically large enough to play the role but its as if his shoes don't really fit. He is simply miscast. He is less masculine than Luz Benedict played by Mercedes McCmbridge, and out classed by Elizabeth Taylor who rises to the levels demanded of every scene. Her character, Leslie, is stronger, more confident and far more imaginative than that of Hudson's Bic who is more of a whiner than a winner. I like this film but everywhere Hudson is on the screen he is overpowered. He must have been a second choice for somebody with an actual acting range. It's a good plot and an interesting story but Mr. Hudson is far better as a conniving ad executive in Pilow Talk than he is as a melodramatic , overwhelmed alpha macho as he is supposed to be in Giant.
Giant is a good movie
I really love seeing the movie Giant, I love the actors too. But there are a few mistakes in the film, when they are at the banquet for Jett, there are radio networks there, one says ABC but I don't think ABC was a radio network and when the family eats at Sarge's Place, there is a television on a stand on the wall. This was supposed to be after WWII was over and I don't think they even had television in diners in what was supposed to be 1947 or 1948, plus in the synopsis, Judy and her husband have a DAUGHTER, Judy IV Not a son.
- keith christensen
Dear TCM, Why do you feel compelled to show this piece of junk every week!!?? Maybe, once a year. That would do. I actually do think James Dean did a good job---kind of. But, that "aw shucks" thing that Rock Hudson was doing with that terrible Texas accent could quite have possibly finished his career. Liz Taylor is Liz Taylor. Always good. And, she's always just lovely.And, that horrible aging make up they did on everyone in the last half is inexcusable. AND, Thanks to the Mute button I don't have to listen to the children Choirs singing. This movie is an epic dud.
a epic with significant flaws
I like the movie but some aspects just do not make clear sense. For a quick example, that house , the center of Reata life, is a rambling victorian n]i]ghtmre that would be more appropriate for the Addams family rather than the hard riding, hard drinking, super masculine Benedict clan. Secondly, the location of the house is preposterous. The headquarters of a massive cattle ranch, there isn't a blade grass for those cattle to eat for miles in any direction. That house is as about as desolate and as isolated as any human habitation on the planet might be. If NASA was looking for people to coloniize Mars, the isolated Benedicts whose nearest neighbor is 100 miles away (and they don't like them anyway) would make good subjects. Secondly, and it has been noted below, there is Luz. God she is mean. She is downright butch and damn unpleasant especially to Elizabeth Taylor's character. Luz can beat up any character at Reata and they know it including her brother. She is a control freak and her death is a comeuppance for her. She abused that beautiful horse as she decided to out ride every person in Texas. She got what was coming to her but still haunts the family with her controlling antics when she leaves land to the boozey deadbeat Jett Rink. It just makes no sense. She gives Rink land just to stir up passions and problems long after she croaks. She controls from her grave. Creepy.
Way Over Rated by Critics
I do not understand why TCM and reviewers give this movie such high ratings. To me, the acting is stilted, stiff and very unrealistic. I like the story, but I think the acting is actually bad by all 3 stars. I can't even understand what James Dean is saying part of the time.
Bigger actors needed for GIANT
Let me say up front that I like the movie. It's too long, and it can't compare to GONE WITH THE WIND, but it captures the story of Texas and attempted to deal with ethnic bigotry. That said, I thought the movie was too one-sided in its unflattering depiction of the Texans and it's overdoing Leslie as a saint as the northerner coming to civilize the heathen Texans. I do think the movie would have been better with a different cast. Elizabeth Taylor looked beautiful and performed well, but slipped up with her accent being all over the place. Rock Hudson was just too handsome and wooden for the part, although he performed well. James Dean was pretty bad, in my opinion. I really can't stand actors who think mumbling makes them brilliant. There were so many talented actors at the time who I think would have done better with the material, and perhaps could have brought some much-needed vitality to a movie that got boring at times. I would have preferred more about Texas and less family soap opera--Having three bratty disappointing kids is a plotline not unique to Texas!
Liz Taylor at her best
There are so many anomalies in this movie they would be difficult to list. How would any living creature survive in that barren dust bowl? Exactly how did the Benedicts make money raising cattle in a desert? I believe cattle still need lots of rich grass and lots of fresh water and that wasteland has neither. What a dumb selection as the main location of the movie. And who builds a house that would rival the Addams Family mansion in the middle of that desert? The film is entertaining, but most of the characters are caricatures. That senator speaking at Jett Rink's dinner is very prototype of a condescending political wind bag. Rock Hudson is in over his head. His best scenes come at the end; the fight in the diner and the final scene as he looks at his two grandchildren. Otherwise, he struggles to be real. He is certainly no match for his far more masculine sister, Luz, played by Mercedes McCambridge. Luz, however, is creepy and happens to be the toughest dude in Texas. She's so damn self-centered I can't figure why she's even in the plot other than to harass Taylor's character. I'll bet she used to beat the hell out of Bic when they were kids. I felt more regret for the horse having to be put down than Luz buying the farm. I laughed aloud about the comment (below) that stated the scene when the doctor pulls the blanket over Luz and exposes her cowboy boots reminds one of the Wizard of Oz scene when the Wicked Witch of the West tries to remove the ruby slippers from her sister who has just been squashed by a flying house. I can see that. Elizabeth Taylor plays one of her best roles. She is a woman ahead of her time as Leslie Benedict. Her character grows and remains believable throughout the film. She makes it worth watching; well, that and James Dean in his final role in his far too brief life.
too honest ..but i will say it.
it may be deemed a great film..but if I want to see an asshole I can look in the mirror and not waste my time looking at a bunch of them for a couple of hours.
The only worth of this film is a glimpse of James Dean just before his demise. If you know hisbiography, you know this was a contract picture and he literally walked through it. He hated Hudsonand the script. I think the only thing that kept him there was a contract and Liz, whom he liked. The story is a horrible overblown soap opera as all of Ferber's novels were. So there wasn't much for a second-rate director to work with...and it shows. A sprawling mistake from start to finish.
I like Giant. I also like the fact that TCM viewers have a chance to express their opinions about the movies the network shows in the States and in Canada. I read the comment, below, reminding us that the movie isn't real life. Well, duh. That doesn't mean we lose the chance to express opinions about the movie, how it was made, the actors, the plot and anything else that goes into the making of a film. Of course, Giant is not real life. It's great entertainment but it's not perfect and it's fun to speculate how it might have been improved or to discuss other actors who were considered for parts or scenes in the movie that could have been improved upon. That's why this section is called "Reviews." I thank TCM for this opportunity. And as much as I like the movie I wonder who else might have been considered for the part of Bic Benedict. This may have been Mr Hudson's best role but he is not as strong in his role as Ms Taylor is in her role. It's also painful to realize James Dean never saw a finished version of the movie because he was killed in that accident shortly after he finished filming his scenes. He is very good in Giant but he is far better in the early scenes when he is a young man than when he is portraying a far older Jett Rink at the end of the movie. I sometimes wonder whenever I see Giant why Luz left that land to Jett because she must have known how much that would anger her brother, Bic, and what havoc it could cause. What were her motives? This is never clarified in the movie. I wonder what other reviewers here might think.
I love this movie it is FANTASTIC! I have watched this several times. People are critiquing this movie as if it were real life. It is a drama. It is surreal. Just enjoy.....
some strange performances
Someone posted that the character of Luz is weird. I totally agree. She is the unkind, unfriendly, selfish and territorial sister of Bic Benedict (Hudson). She dies early in the film but after seeing how she mistreated that beautiful horse, its easier for the audience to grieve for the stallion than for Luz when that abused horse threw her. And the scene when the doctor pulls a blanket over Luz's dead body and exposes her boots is so similar to the scene when Dorothy tries to remove the ruby slippers from the wicked witch in the Wizard of Oz after the house landed on her. Both evil women, Luz and the witch, got just what was coming to them. James Dean receives high praise in this film but I don't get it. He is so quirky in the first half of the movie that it seems as if he has some sort of neurological disease. He can barely utter a clear sentence. His mannerisms are so convoluted he should be hospitalized. And he morphs from a character who appears to be a fairly decent (altos anti-social) guy to a raving lunatic in the scene when he first strikes oil and it's all down hill from there. By the end of the movie, Dean's character is a cautionary tale on the evils of demon rum and that scene in the grand ballroom is insane. Giant is a decent story but it's almost all stereotyping and not very good stereotyping at that. Oh--that house. Who builds a multi-storey gothic house in the middle of a vast empty grassless desert? And how can anybody raise cattle where there isn't one blade of green grass in any direction? It doesn't make any sense.
Where is the water?
They do not build estates on barren land. Good grass land and soil, are needed to make a fortune in catttle. The discovery of oil could change some of those needs, but who would built a mansion where this film built its set? George Stevens made probably the best Western of all time with Shane. I heard he wanted Montgomery Cliff to play Shane. Allan Ladd began his career as a hired killer, whereas, most of Cliff's work was a sensitive social worker. Whenever I see these two films compared, I can't understand how Stephens would want Cliff. This film is entirely too long, to preachy, and excuss ms, as someone who lived near Marfa while in the USAF, but not a Texan, I saw this film as a cliche of Texans by Non-Texans. Texans I knew from the service could give a pain where you sit, but I don't see any real Texans in this film.
I don't understand the high rating. The story is good, but the acting is so wooden by the main stars. Personally, I like the main stars, but Rock Hudson does not ring true. I think Mercedes McCambridge and James Dean do much better in this Texas accented saga, but not Taylor and Hudson. Good story.
I've always liked this film. It certainly is an epic and by the time it is over, the viewer is so overloaded with Texas that he or she may have the urge to dig for oil or brand something. However, it is one of Elizabeth Taylor's best performances. She is solid as the wife of a Texas megalomaniac played by Rock Hudson. Taylor is strong, convincing and remarkably warm. Her passionate voice for the needs of the Hispanic farmers and families near the ranch is still relevant today. Her ability to stand up to the arrogant all male bastion of Reata, the Texas ranch owned by Hudson's character, is powerful. She plays a woman ahead of her time. Hudson is adequate but he is so breathlessly over-the-top in some scenes that he is more of a caricature than a character. He's just better in a comedy with Doris Day that in a serious role like this. James Dean appears to be a good guy as the film begins but becomes selfish, evil, self-centered and a drunk so consumed by booze that even 24 steps wouldn't help him. Hudson's sister, Luz, is just weird. I can never understand her situation. She is more masculine than Hudson. The best played role is the simple part played by Sal Mineo, an innocent young boy going off to World War II, and his funeral scene offers some real moments of humanity in this otherwise grandiose story. But grandiose doesn't mean the story lacks value or interest. It has both and it offers a message of tolerance and hope. It's a powerful story and worth watching.
Can't imagine Grace Kelly in this film--that would have been dreadful miscasting. Elizabeth Taylor did well enough, but Kelly didn't have the skill for a part like this. Hudson was good in this. I do not understand that glorification of James Dean. I just do not see what all the adoration is about. The mumbling is irritating, and I thought he looked ridiculous in the second half of the film. I think the film would have been better with a different cast.
"You Are One Of Us'
This is the type of film, that if you heap praises on it and use words that one has to run to the dictionary to interpret then my friend, you are a "Liberal Intellectual"---you have passed the mustard. Even if you don't know what you are talking about. The rest of you who disagree are idiots and will never know what it is to be falsely praised.
The always brilliant George Stevens finest epic. It has, surpassed Gone With The Wind, as my favorite film of all time. Don't let the bizarre rants and arguments of the above reviewers put you off. This is as wonderful, big, and epic as film gets, with the finest performances of both Rock Hudson and Dennis Hopper's careers. And pretty close to Elizabeth Taylor's best, too. They all manage to bring an intimacy and character to the film that makes a sweeping epic a very human story, of love and redemption. I am a Texan, and like most Texans, love this film and consider it a classic.
history according to clichae
- kevin sellers
So liberals, the purveyors of the "New Morality," who so irk this reviewer by their championing of rock n roll, and womens rights and their shaming of Texas racists, has "ruled the world" since 1789. Gee, that'll sure come as a surprise to all those Obergrupenfuhrers and black shirts down there, to mention nothing of Napoleon and the Republican party post Reagan. And as for liberals "loss of the ball," which I take to be a dig at the last election, just know that as any good historian will tell you what goes around comes around. In fact, Clichae, a quick immersion into a clear lake of historical inquiry would cleanse you of a lot of your MUDdle.
Here is another piece of 120 years worth of Hollywood celluloid- so grand & dramatic- that is supposed to shame & ridicule a specific element of the human population! This great New Morality has ruled civilization ever since the French Convolution & are hatefully enraged at their seeming loss of the ball!
response to previous review
- kevin sellers
David Start states, in his previous review, that Bris Kettle's "liberal" view that Mexicans should not be discriminated against went "out the window in the last election." Wrong, Dave. Believe Hillary got more votes than The Bigot. A lot more. So clearly there are more of us liberals out there than there are dumb rednecks like you. Thank God.
- David Start
What a load of crap---your type of thinking went out the window in the last election. Your snooty attitude towards us low life, who refuse to think like you, makes me sick. If you had to do it all over again, would you still fall in love with yourself?. Do what all your liberal friends do, go find yourself.
Ahead of it's time.
- Bris Kettle
As stated in the title, I feel this movie not only told a sprawling tale of personal change, conflict, triumphs and tragedies but it also was ahead of it's time in how the movie was made to deliberately show prejudice. For a film maker to want to dedicate and emphasize a pretty a large percentage of this film to show the intolerance that Mexicans and those of Mexican descent had to endure was in a word; brave. I can see how many Texans did not receive the film well, and some still don't as it shows how selfish and small minded some can be. What truly is sad is that now, 60 years later, I watch this film and very many of the aspects of the film regarding us vs. them are still alive and well. I especially saw that these passed few months of this election year. Was there some naivety on the part of the film makers? Yes. There will always be a huge difference between the way films were made then, and how they are made now. The way racism was handled in the film could also be viewed as somewhat naive as it was depicted in movies and TV for decades. For the "great white man" to finally come to the defense of the defenseless poor Mexican, we would always have to believe the Mexican to be defenseless. That's how the Mexican was almost always depicted - poor, little, weak, decrepit, uneducated, in need of a hero to save him/her. But for the time, it was good that this cold bucket of water was thrown on audiences and that being treated like a non-human was not going unnoticed. One idea that was conveyed well was the character of Angel. How he was one of the "wetback" but went to fight on behalf of his country, a country in which some looked down on Angel and his people because they were different. And Angel paying the ultimate price for his country, with his life then subsequently showing the small group that received Angels body vs. the humongous homecoming for Benedict's son in law. Hopefully, it was an eye opener for some at the time and since
Have A Party After Work And----
Let me suggest if you have a copy of this film and invite several of your follow employees over for a party after work. The trick being after starting this film, see how long it takes for the first employee to fall asleep. It's the last employee who is able to stay awake through out most of the movie, who wins. What's the prize? Well give them your DVD copy of "Giant". That's how I got rid of mine in less then 30 seconds.
Rooting For tThe---
- J. D. Jitters
I tried my best to stay awake, and thought what a great film to have in one's collection, if one needs a nap. The only in teresting part of this film was the fight scene at the restaurant--where I was cheering on the owner and thinking Rock Hudson's character should mind his own business. But, in the liberal thinkers eyes Rock was the beaten up hero.
- Michael Whitty
"Giant" is a mammoth story of Texas as the cattle ranges made way for oil ranges. Rock Hudson is the cattle owner with a big house out on the range and brings his new wife from Kentucky to Texas and James Dean is the ranch hand who later takes a small part of the land and discovers oil. Hollywood came to Marfa Texas in June of 1955 with George Stevens directing and creating the Benedict family and their relationships with those around. Elizabeth Taylor as Rock's wife scores well as Leslie who has her influence on those around her. James Dean as Jett Rink becomes a little villainous after he strikes it rich and has a memorable fight with Rock toward the end. James Dean died in a car crash after doing his scenes on September 30,1955 and Hollywood lost a rare talent. But this George Stevens presentation running over 3 hours was a big hit for Warner Brothers in the 50s and George Stevens won the Oscar for directing.
We did steal Texas from Mexico. ouch! what a line. My God any self respecting Texan, would have kicked her butt right out the door. Somebody take this self righteous, pompous ass, down to San Antonio De Bexar and show her the Alamo, then drive up to Goliad where Santa Anna had 400 Texans butchered, after they surrendered under honourable conditions. Whining Liz Taylor, does it again. She acts and sounds just like she did in Cat On A Hot Tin Roof, Cleopatra and just about every other film she ever made. James Dean, another one you can forget. Same sulking, whining, mumbling whimp, as in Rebel Without A (clue) ooops Cause. HOW did a Great director, George Stevens EVER get saddled (no pun intended) with this loooonnng, boring tribute to the idle rich. Id rather watch grass grow, than this snore.
Everyone loves this film, except for most Texans.
Saw this film when I lived in Pa. Like many in the Air Force, lived in Texas, in the Permian Basin district in Abilene Texas. You could say this was the geographical and heart of Texas. The King Ranch, was NOT Texas as I knew it, and not Austin, which seems to be the liberal northeast living in an oasis of the rest of the state, which had few Indians, (more live in New York State). The film is too political and by being filled with trite scenes, in my mind is a failure as a film, and why I gave it one star. Rock Hudson could never play a genuine Texan, Air Force Wing Commander, (I was in SAC and would rest my expertise on that), and a whiner like James Dean would never made it out of grade school. If he did he would play jacks with the girls. Sorry If I am telling my version of the truth. Perhaps Dean killed himself because he recognized what a blown up flash in a pan he was and will be, as more talented whiners have replaced him with hundreds of non Clark Gable and John Wayne men.
A Somewhat Acceptable Adaptation of a Great Book.
The movie GIANT is not as good as the book by Edna Ferber (one of my favorite writers.) Why George Stevens felt he had to mess with the book is beyond me--I don't think this would happen today, and I do think GIANT would make a superb mini-series on one of the cable channels. Elizabeth Taylor is perfectly cast and is simply wonderful as Leslie Lynnton Benedict, the transplanted Virginian. Rock Hudson, although he doesn't look anything like the way Jordan (Bick) Benedict is described by Ms. Ferber, does a very good job with the role. Mercedes McCambridge shines as the spinster (and mildly crazed, in love with her brother Luz Benedict). Sal Mineo does a good job in portraying the Mexican-American Angel Obregon, who gives his life for the United States in World War II. And of course James Dean as the pyschologically complex ranch hand and oil wildcatter is magnificent. The other actors get very short thrift, especially Chill Willis as Uncle Bawley, who is much more important player in the book. One of the most important aspects of the book, that Leslie moves the family out of the "Big House" and into the original, ramshackle ranch house, is left out. This is the moment when Leslie truly becomes the matriarch of the Benedict family.Another important aspect of the book--an important landmark in talking about the bigotry against Mexican-Americans as well as the attitude about illegal Mexican immigrants ("wetbacks," in the vernacular of the day) and an incredibly relevant issue which is echoing in 2016's Presidential elections--which of course today, February 2016--is when Angel is buried in Arlington Cemetery with full U.S. military honors, instead of being buried in the neglected Mexican cemetery on Reata Ranch. I could go on and on, but I won't. I will only say (again) that GIANT is an incredibly relevant book, and that I think that Stevens' movie is an "acceptable" adaptation--BUT IT COULD HAVE BEEN SO MUCH MORE.
- Michael Whitty
A movie as big as Texas "Giant" is still the best movie made about Texas with the starpower of Elizabeth Taylor, Rock Hudson, and James Dean. How Texas went from cattle ranges to oil fields and how people started making $1 million dollars a month from their oil is somewhat told. When Hollywood moved in to Marfa,Texas in the summer of 1955 everyone got a glimpse of Liz and Rock but were heartbroken around the end of September when James Dean died after filming. His character went from ranch hand to millionaire overnight when his well erupted and in one memorable scene he has a fight with Rock on opening night ceremonies of his new airport. "Giant" won the Best Director Oscar for George Stevens with this movie and the movies started to get bigger.
Strange American flag in Jett parade.
- Joe Ochlak
I was watching the movie Giant. During the parade given in honor of the James Dean character Jett, the United States flag only has 37 stars on it (three rows of seven stars and two rows of eight stars. This was the number of states in the 1800s just following the Civil War. If by chance the top row of stars, which would have eight stars, was curled over because of the wind, it would only bring the number of stars to 44 stars. This was the number of states in the late 1800s. Whoever made this movie really messed up.
- kevin sellers
Sure it has its flaws and its excesses and of course it's too long (You want a film with this title to be short?) but if you don't like "Giant" then you don't like movies. Solid B.
My favorite movie Five staes in ever way
I love it
One of my favorite movies. I can't see it enough. To me as a Texan, it is THE Texas movie. And it helps that it depicts a time period (at least the later part) that I remember well. It was not afraid to pull any punches in regards to how Mexicans were treated and regarded back then, although it was not as hard hitting as the book in that regard. That topic was taboo in the movies of the 50's. The only other one to briefly touch on it as far as I know is "High Noon." The cast is superb and it needs to be remembered that this was the last performance of James Dean that we have in this world. What don't I like? At times the backdrop looks a bit phony and the premise that a Texan has to travel to Maryland to buy a horse is absurd. But, I guess that is how it had to be so that Bick and Leslie meet. And it would have been highly unlikely that Bick's son back then would have married a Mexican girl, the prejudice was that strong against that. Anyway, it shows a great time in the history of Texas, when millionaires were crated overnight just because they had oil on their land. And the last scene really is a hard hitting one---showing the eyes of the two babies in the playpens as the "Eyes of Texas" is played. Bick changed in his attitudes throughout the movie and so did the State, just a little later in time. But one thing that has not changed that is shown in that movie is the grandeur and glory of Texas and its people. I am glad and proud that such a movie was made and shown to the world. And just imagine yourself living in the small town of Marfa in West Texas and learning that Rock Hudson, Elizabeth Taylor, and James Dean were coming to the town. And when they were there, the filming was accessible to the residents and many appeared as extras in the film. That experience had to be really something for them.
This film certainly lives up to it's title. A family of Texas ranchers experience changes as their business is taken over by oil. Magnificent performances from Taylor and the supporting cast; Dean, in his last film, was the first performer to be nominated for an Oscar posthumously twice, Hudosn received his only nomination as well and this was McCambridge's final nomination. Director Stevens deservedly won the film's only Oscar for handling the entire production, making great use of the landscape and talking themes of racism and changing social roles. An outstanding production of Ferber's novel. I give it a 5/5.
- Lois Hopton
Great movie,5 stars. Sad to see TCM show these great movies and see scenes cut out,what a shame. I know these movies, know right away where a cut comes. TCM I respect, but am disappointed the Bosses ordered this atrosicity.
- Bev J
This story never grows old. Cinematography is wonderful. Acting at it's best. 5 Stars!
Edna Ferber excelled at fiction laced with fact and she does that with "Giant." Riata was fashioned after the King Ranch in Texas, with Bick Benedict being Richard King and Jett Rink being modeled after Glenn McCarthy. All similarities end right here. Not one of Richard King's heirs married a Mexican and they wouldn't have dared! To this day, not one of them has married a Mexican or Mexican-American. Glenn McCarthy was never on the King Ranch and he was not an uneducated drunk. He was very educated and the quintessential Texas oil millionaire. McCarthy did build a huge hotel in Houston and threw a big party but the Kings were NOT there and a Constellation was sent by McCarthy from Texas to Los Angeles to ferry the stars to the party. McCarthy did not give any drunken speech or get into a brawl either! Now...to the film. Elizabeth Taylor, as always, is gorgeous. Hudson is all brash and brawn. The kids are first-class brats. I don't know what Ms. Ferber intended with the emphasis on Mexicans in this film but it goes completely awry. She stayed on the King Ranch and saw the men and women (kineros = born on the King's Ranch) there and I guess she wanted to incorporate that but she missed by a mile because of so many untruths. The film is about 70 minutes too long and it wears on the viewer. Beautiful cinematography but lousy film.
Giant (1956 film)
- James C. Puccio
The early defense of Hispanic culture in Texas society was not, strictly speaking, accurate as presented in the film. Racism ran pretty much rampant in Texas as it did in the rest of the country in 1956. But the films limited attempt at showing the beginning struggle for human rights was noteworthy. Also, the daily lives of the Benedict family was too artificial and contrived to seriously expect an audience to accept. All the Benedict family did each day is sit around in carefully washed and pressed clothes reading the newspapers in every room and on every sofa and every porch rockers. The Mexican servants cared for the house maintenance and upkeep, food preparation and the children's care while the whites sat about reflected the realities of the cliched human race relations of 1956 American society. The prejudices encountered at the hotel salon and the roadside cafe were real enough, adding to the film's otherwise shaky claim to realistic portrayal of life in the fifties led by, what appear for the most part, to be exceptionally idle and sadly limited pursuits of the wealthy. Even the salacious drunk scenes lacked the spontaneity and reality of true drunk rambling slop. James Dean was the best dressed and most contained drunk I've ever seen in the final hotel party scene. At least until he opened his mouth. The pure drunken drivel suddenly and completely ended James Dean's role. The film needed a subsequent scene to include perhaps a redeeming gesture by Dean.Rich Oil Barron Texan's lives comprised simply of sitting around in spotless rooms while draping one's body around different pieces of furniture while reading newspapers and drinking became a cliche. If reality was what the director and studio were after within the film. sadly the only scenes that passed the reality check were the DC-6 and Constellation flight sequences filmed in and around the Burbank Arport, true-life exciting and historically accurate flight scenes for aircraft buffs like me.
Liz verse Grace
- Teddy Scott
This is one of my favorite movies, seen it many, many times, but I wanted to hear what DREW thought. My Father owned the Princess Theater, Bingham Canyon, Ut. My early life was movies and I was in awe with this one. DREW, You are so right on the cinematography, the scene from the train to the ranch house is truly amazing with the music makes it even better. ROBERT, Dame Liz and Rock had a special friendship that they brought to the screen, Grace could not have done it, cant see it, sorry. ROBERT, please keep DREW, get rid of CHER. DREW, another of my favorite movies is 'HE'S JUST NOT THAT INTO YOU'. I'm 70yrs old and it reminded me when I was dating. Love it watch it a lot. As I love TMC. GOOD WORK GUYS.
Almost a Masterpiece
- David H.
First of all, Elizabeth Taylor is outstanding as the feisty wife who is not run over by her changed environment (I don't think Grace Kelly would have done any better in this role) and James Dean when he's not mumbling is fabulous. However, Robert Osborne is right when he said the movie was too long. As an example, the prejudice against Mexicans, especially the son's wife, becomes repetitious. The entire sequence when the son confronts Jett over the slight to his wife could have been eliminated because the restaurant scene was more than sufficient. Other scenes which could been shortened or eliminated include the military funeral for Angel, Bick trying to one up Jett with the airplane and the kids crying over the Thanksgiving turkey. The reconciliation scene at the sister's wedding comes off as a rip-off of the final scene from "The Best Years of Our Lives." While this is certainly a very good movie it definitely needed more tightening and trimming for it to be a masterpiece.
My personal Fave movie from the 50's
GIANT is every bit the epic it was created to be. I have never tired of the film's length, entertainment, or the important story it tells. It is the pure western Americana of the era and the cattle-baron-to-oil-millionaires saga of the Benedict family that I so enjoy. The entire cast is genius in their roles. I used to own the movie in VHS and would love to have the DVD.
One of the All time Greats
Love this movie my kids grew up watching it . I own it on VHS will always have a VCR to watch Giant on it
Glad to Finally See
I have been wanting to see this film for awhile, so I was very glad I got to see it all last night. It was a bit long, but for me I think most of that "I-can't-believe-this-movie-has-another-whole-hour-to-go" feeling came from it being past my bedtime. It would be fun to see it during the afternoon. I enjoyed everyone in the movie and the dusty desolation at times the camera brought to my living room. Watching the house and surrounding landscape grow and change through the years only to have the movie end in the one room that hadn't changed, with Taylor telling Hudson that he was finally her hero, brought the movie around full circle. After watching all of that, I listened to Robert and Drew give their closing thoughts. Robert mentioned how Grace Kelly was asked to play the role and he felt she would have actually made the film better because she had a certain "softness" and "East Coast Philadelphia Air" while Taylor had a certain "toughness" and could be a sort of a "tomboy." So then I start replaying in my mind all of the scenes with Kelly instead of Taylor, and I see what Robert was saying. I think it would have shown more contrast and more depth in how Kelly could have played the part. With Kelly's soft energy, it would have appeared much more jarring against the harsh landscape of the terrain and the people.
My Grandmother took me to see this movie in Nevada when it opened. I was six. This is the first time I have seen it since. It was inspiring and because I now live in Texas it is seemingly more relevant. There were times in the film that I had wished more and stronger writing for Elizabeth Taylor. The few scenes she had left me wanting her to be more demonstrative. I guess for the fifties it was. By the way, Texas has not changed much from the depiction in this film.
My uncle was correct
My Aunt and Uncle were big movie fans. Went every week end. Never heard them rip a film up, until they saw Giant. Years later I saw it on TV. Wen James Dean was a teen idol. I could never see him being one of the guys if he went to our school. As for his acting, I think our HS Drama club had more talent. There is so much adoration of Dean its sickening. It demeans the many hundreds of actors who played many parts, entertained us for years, and never receive the attention Dean has received.As for the film itself, they spent a lot of money, had first line stars and I notice its not on DVD. Where my relatives correct in their views? Did this film make money. I do not know anyone who likes it, and I am a big TCM fan.
Excellent film and acting
Giant is an excellent film- exceptional acting. This was James dean's final film. GREAT MOVIE
Worth the time
Finally had the time to sit and watch this end to end. I found it an epic retelling of and old story, the struggle between tradition and change. James Dean is classic, Elizabeth Taylor is excellent, and Mercedes McCambridge steals the show early on with relatively little screen time. Fortunately I didn't let Husky Miller's review keep me away. When I got to "Giant is long winded ", and realized I was only halfway through, I quit reading. I decided I didn't like the double standard.
Everytime I see this movie I enjoy more than the time before. One of my favorites of all time! The end in the diner is one of the greatest fights I have ever seen onscreen.
Dying was a Good Career Move
If James Dean hadn't died shortly after, his performance would be assessed more realistically. He is creepy, twitchy and affected. What was he thinking?
Beautiful, but empty.
It's like a soap opera, a very long soap opera. I didn't like Dean older.
Tale told in great detail. A list cast. Beautiful scenery. Love, disappointment, ego, class issues, obsession, determination and more all shown. The movie is lengthy and has always held my attention. One of my favorites.
Eu adoro este filme. Ele longo,mas no cansativo. Ver o James Dean algo espetacular . Elzabeth Taylor no auge de sua beleza e talento. O filme brilhante.
A COMPELLING EPIC
- Henry Hoffman
The comments by one Husky Miller are scattered & have all the certitude of a non-practitioner. His review narrative is laced w/ an insufferable self-importance instead of addressing Mr. Stevens' work w/ the respect that an artist of his pedigree mostly certainly deserves. My expectations of GIANT were aroused & (indeed) fulfilled, because the storytelling is rooted in a precise moment-to-moment decision-making. The actors, who are surrounded by an appalling creative technology, are in fierce consonance w/ the director's mise en scene & he so thrills our senses that the lesson of the scourge of bigoty is unforgettable. All great films are (in some way) about parents & children, so Bick's struggle to get his kids in alignment w/ his intentions for them is a worthy ancillory thread for character delineation. And was not Husky Miller (at least) impressed w/ the two massive fistfights (Bick vs Jett & Bick vs Sarge), which served as highly creative color reflectors of the story's landscape? Finally, Mr. Stevens never betrays his hand in stylistic flourishes; instead, he stands outside his canvas. staring w/ an autumnal glare, but always suffused w/ compassion. A landmark film from a director who can take his place in the pantheon of great film directors.
Thank You, Edna Ferber
For those who do not know, this is the "inside poop" about "Giant". The author, Edna Ferber, came down to live at the famous King Ranch in South Texas and to also write her book that became the basis for the movie we saw last night on TCM. After some time had passed, the Kleberg family asked to read some of her novel and were shocked at the way some of the family members were portrayed! (They especially didn't like how Luz Benedict was depicted since she, in many ways, was supposed to be a reflection of Mrs. Henrietta King!) Anyway, Ms. Ferber was asked to leave post haste and she finished her Texas novel up north! The movie "Giant" is a whole lot better than the book which is full of even more stereotypes. I am from Texas and we don't sit around talking about our state 24/7! Some of us are people just like anybody else!
A Big, Giant, Texas-sized Bore!
I have been trying to catch this movie for years thinking it would be something incredible. Oh, how wrong I was. This thing is so long, and so boring, it's no wonder I fell asleep on it during my first couple attempts to watch. It tries so hard to be a big sweeping epic: the "Gone With The Wind of The Southwest." Instead it's just blah!! The first hour and a half or so is ok, but by the time the kids are ready to go to college, for me it was just a big fat who cares! This movie doesn't have much to say other than a halfhearted attempt at promoting racial tolerance and acceptance. And while that's nice and all, it's simply not enough to keep my attention. I'm mean, this thing is set in Texas. Where the hell is the action? I don't need gun fights but do something other than eat cow brains on the plains and watch oil wells populate that boring Texas landscape.I will admit however that James Dean's performance is very good. BTW, I'm not a JD fan, but for me this his best work. Any who...Again, Giant is long-winded, meandering, uneven, and completely falls apart somewhere between the second and third hour. At that point it's all over the place. That last hour plus is just so untogether and unfocused, it felt like the scenes were just spliced together, seemingly with no purpose other than to make the movie longer than it needs to be. It certainly could have done with some severe editing because I saw no reason this film needed to be three hours and 18 minutes long.Look, don't get me wrong -- it's not horrible, it's just not all it's hyped to be. So listen, if you want to invest three plus hours of your life in a film, you're better off watching Gone With the Wind, Doctor Zhivago, Ben Hur, or even Lawrence of Arabia (which by the way I'm not a huge fan of). Even so, I'd still rather watch that David Lean dust up before watching Giant ever again.
- Sue McDonald
If this movie is true to Edna Ferber's book, she was an early oracle of the Hispanic-Caucasian relationship in Texas. Caucasians are (still) gradually coming to view Hispanics as equal family memberstrue to her prediction. As a 12-year-old Texan, I recognized and agreed with the critique of ethnic bigotry in this film. Strange---because such bigotry was widely accepted as normal in the Texas of the 50's. Perhaps author Edna Ferber and director George Stevens helped us to overcome that. Seeing the movie as an older Texan, I find the ethnic blending theme to be the most poignant, although I still love the way the directors and the stars depict all the characters and themes (which include class and generational, as well as ethnic, divides). Only "Lone Star" captures Texas diversity and conflicts better. I'm a little surprised that I still admire Taylor's and Hudson's performances, but they were excellent (despite Hudson's less-than-accurate Texas accent). Of course, James Dean's performance is still mesmerizing. And I love the music!
four stars giant
i have loved this movie since i was a child and i am 55 now i want to purchase this movie for my oldie but goodys. thank you tcm for playing giant.
Giant of a movie
Just a good moviewith great actors
A new viewpoint: Thanks TCM!
I've seen "Giant" dozens of times. Thanks to TCM, this is the first time I watched it focusing on Latino images. Doing so was much more interesting. They seem to have done a pretty good job, considering this film was made over 50 years ago. I like how it ends. Thanks TCM for teaching me a new way of watching shows.
Rock Hudson and Elizabeth Taylor were are lovely looking couple in 1956. Maybe their good looks counted them or not. Now, they don't. What matters most now is the quality of acting. "Giant" is now a timely film in the US. As the nation addresses immigration, equality and status related issues, so does "Giant." TCM chose to show this epic because of how it contends with Latino images and issues. Happily, neither Dame Elizabeth nor Rock Hudson would have cooperated with bigotry of any brand. Both were social leaders in that regard. Dame Elizabeth continues to be, to her credit.
Dame Elizabeth and Rock Hudson
I recall watching this film for the first time. Then, I thought what a beautiful couple Rock Hudson and Elizabeth Taylor made. That was long before I knew Hudson was gay. Dame Elizabeth knew and didn't care eons earlier. I'll always be fond of her for that since she was both right and well ahead of the US public's bigotry."Giant" is an important epic due to how it deals bigotry due to ethnicity. This is my second favorite film of Hudson's. Dame Elizabeth and he had the star power to take on such a controversial topic and how.
"Giant" Epic Seen A New Way
- Bruce Reber
I have seen "Giant" several times, but when I watched it on TCM Thursday night 5/14/09 as part of its Latino Images in Film festival I saw this epic film in a new way. Besides being a story about the fortunes of a Texas cattle and oil family, it gives a frank depiction of Mexican Americans and their relations with caucasians and the poverty and discrimination they suffer. When I had seen "Giant" before, I mostly saw the interraction between the 3 main characters; Bick Benedict the headstrong cattleman, Leslie his wife, and Jett Rink the cowboy, and how their situations change as the story progresses. It is probably the first film to show Mexican Americans and their situation in a realistic way. This was James Dean's third and last film. He died way too young in a car crash at age 24. If only he had lived, we can only imagine the films he would have done and the great career he would have had. He would have been one of the greatest, along with Marlon Brando, Paul Newman, and all the others!
Don't mess with Texas!
- Pat Turman
I was born & raised in Colorado but have lived the last 10 years in Amarillo, Texas. It wasn't until I saw "Giant" that I began to have any sense of understanding or sympathy for the mentality of Texans. I don't want to insult anybody here suffice to say that the attitude of the Texans in this movie, when it comes to tradition vs. change, is dead accurate. Having said that, it's just a great movie no matter where you live. I thought it was interesting how George Stevens cast the actors. For the roles of the authority figures wanting to maintain the status quo, he cast traditional Hollywood movie stars embedded in the studio system. For the characters who threatened the status quo, he picked actors who threatened the Hollywood studio system in real life. And what can you say about James Dean? The scene of him walking his newly acquired land is a true piece of Americana that will last well into the future.
- Joe Root
Consider:Sal Mineo in brownfaceThe white son-in-law comes back from the war, the Mexican kid doesn't.James Dean gripes about being poor, but then turns down ready money to keep the land Luz wills to him, even though it's not enough land on which to raise cattle. Then the land has oil.Rough and tough rancher father has son who wants to go to Harvard and be a doctor.Father is from Texas and son comes back from med school to minister to the poor Mexican ranch workers.Son then marries Mexican girl.Then father sees error of his bigoted ways.And the crowning scene: Elizabeth T. is back in Maryland for a spell, during a rough patch with Rock, and her sister's wedding is in the house. Rock arrives just as the service begins and manages to move just behind ET. Long take on anguished faces as service concludes. She turns, sees him, they fall into a clich.Gasbag.
A REAL GIANT
this was one of my favorites. One of the best with a giant of a cast.